A) "Will Self said, "Not all LEAVERS are racist, but all racists are LEAVERS."

• This is a vast generalisation.
• There is no way of proving whether or to what extent it is true or not.
• conclusion: Mr Self's oh-so-clever soundbite is irrelevant BS.
  

B) "Visit leave.eu facebook page and see the racist bile left by LEAVE voters."

• The number of people writing such stuff on social media is unquantifiable.
• Basing arguments, opinions and decisions on social media comments is absurd.
• Most REMAINER comment was ill-informed BS (and often very nasty).
• This kind of comment was not reserved for FB but was all over the REMAINER media.
• SOME LEAVERS were no doubt "racist" (itself a word that has lost most of its useful meaning in recent years) - a HUGE NUMBER were NOT "racist" (whatever that is)
• A MAJORITY of REMAINER propaganda was devoted to claiming that LEAVERS were "racist" - which of course was just more BS.
• conclusion: The comment is irrelevant.
  

C) "I never said the stockmarket would collapse and I never said house prices would fall."

Many REMAINERS did. "Project Fear" was not just on social media, but the BBC, in "The Guardian", in official Labour propaganda and on many news outlets. BREXIT was supposed to be a catastrophe on all fronts. In addition, a huge number of REMAINER comment in all media alleged that LEAVERS were racist, old, selfish and stupid. Their rational and reasoned arguments for leaving were rarely debated.

FACT: HARDLY ANY of "Project Fear" occurrred; since 2016, none of the following has collapsed: the GBP, manufcturing, exports, the stockmarket, house prices.

Just one example: Aug 12, 2021 · Facts4EU.Org’s analysis shows that UK exports to the EU have rebounded by 31.5% since the first quarter of the year, and that exports to the EU are 20% higher than they were five years ago, just before the EU Referendum.

D) "That said, the pound fell by 10% on the night of the vote and it has never recovered."

FACT: Currencies fluctuate all the time. Before 2016 many commentators said the £ was overvalued:

E) "We were also promised £350m a week for the NHS (lie)"

It is the above statement which is a lie.

• NOBODY 'promised' that; the campaign slogan said: "Let's fund our NHS instead."
• Whether the insane sums sent to the EU WOULD actually be switched wholesale to the NHS depended on the government. I refer you to the slogan's first words: "Let's ..."

F) "Fishermen would be better off. (lie)"

Fishermen WOULD be better of if we had properly LEFT the EU and regained complete control of our internationally-resognized fishing grounds in the way that Iceland and Norway have for example. Thanks to Tories lies & duplicity, WE HAVE NOT ACTUALLY 'LEFT' THE EU. The Tory "deal" IN NO WAY attains this goal. If fishermen are not better off is NOT BECAUSE OF BREXIT because as far as fishing goes we DO NOT HAVE BREXIT.

Conclusion: the complaint in F) is irrelevant.

G) "Farmers would be better off (lie)"

After 40 years of entanglement in EU bureaucracy it is hardly surprising that breaking free would bring some difficulties. I refer you to the other ONE HUNDRED AND SIXTY-FIVE SOVEREIGN STATES who manage their farming outside the EU. Farmers WILL be better off, but 1) we are still in a transition period and 2) WE HAVE NOT REALLY LEFT.

H) "The amount of money spent on building the country would be unchanged (lie)"

LEAVERS did not promise that, which is in the hands of the current government.
conclusion: the complaint is itself a lie.


I) "Roaming charges would not come back (lie)."

The UK’s carriers all previously said they had no plans to reintroduce roaming fees

• LEAVERS were only quoting the phone companies.
• So what if roaming charges have been reintroduced after the companies said they wouldn't be. Take up your complaint with Vodaphone, EE etc.
• Da Vinci managed fine without a mobile. Who cares about such a pathetically unimportant matter compared to regaining our sovereignty?
  

J) "The EU have given us grace periods on border checks which are soon coming to an end."

FACTS:

• The UK was in the EU for four decades; it will take time to unravel the bureaucratic horror the EU entwined us in.
• The EU has done its UTMOST in every way to make the UK suffer for having the temerity to LEAVE. We should be grateful that the EU army is not powerful enough to prevent us from LEAVING as the North did to the South in the American Civil war and in countless other situations where a people wanted their independence.
• The UK is the world's FOURTH or FIFTH LARGEST ECONOMY; the idea that it cannot somehow survive and thrive outside the EU is laughably stupid.
• Numerous trade deals have already been made with the rest of the world, with which our trading is increasing relative to the EU as it has for years.
• The EU has a SIXTY BILLION GPB SURPLUS with the UK. Whatever border restrictions they impose will ONLY HURT THEM MORE. It is true that they don't give a toss about that - only about retaining their power and messing up BREXIT as much as possible to deter others from leaving.
• And there is no shortage of others: much of Eastern Europe is fed up with EU fascism; the Med countries are still struggling inside the fixed-rate euro straitjacket to the benefit of Germany. Both France and Germany are in social, economic and financial trouble varying from severe inconvenience to foreseeable and imminent meltdown.
  

K) "BREXIT has not really happened yet. That's when things will get worse"

conclusion: Which is clearly what REMAINERS fervently hope for, having never accepted the democratic vote and wishing the worst on our country so as to force it back to abandoning its sovereignty. We will see, but it will take time to unravel the bureauacratic and venal shambles the EU ensnared us in.

---

IMMIGRATION & RACISM

• The UK has always welcomed immigrants.
• Because we have utter sheit governments, NOBODY HAS A CLUE how many immigrants have arrived in the last two decades, only that it is in the MILLIONS into one of the most densely-populated regions of Europe.
• MANY THOUSANDS of indigenous Brits sleep rough, including military veterans the political Establishment seems not to give a toss about.
• There is a severe housing shortage; many young indigenous Brits simply cannot afford to buy their own dwelling.
• Edicational, health and social services infrastructure is staggering under the weight of the extra millions who have arrived.
• Those arriving include THOUSANDS OF ILLEGAL MIGRANTS a month, ALL of whom have to be housed, fed, medically treated and so on and on and on. NB. THEY ARE NOT "refugees" - they are ILLEGAL MIGRANTS allowed into Europe by Merkel, given money to travel from Greece up to Calais and aided by the French to cross the Channel.
• A MAJORITY of immigrants in recent years have been Muslims. Many of those from Pakistan have been reponsible for the hideous sexual abuse of up to ONE MILLION young British girls over FOUR DECADES in MULTIPLE British cities.Such behaviour is part of their culture and 'religion'.
• Most Muslims (who by definition hate our culture and values) go to "Muslim areas", where few indigenous Brits would ever go, where the police hardly ever go and which resemble downtown Teheran more than England.
• A very large majority of Muslim immigrants do not work but merely live off benefits.

---

England's population density is 413 people per square kilometre, European countries would have to take in the following numbers of migrants to give them the same population density:

Austria 26.4 million Denmark 12.4 million France 162.3 million Germany 65.6 million Greece 42.8 million

Italy 64.7 million Poland 90.5 million Romania 79.4 million Spain 162.1 million Sweden 176.3 million

Conversely, if England had the same population density
as say France, its population would be 14.5 million.

IT IS NOT "RACIST" to say that ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. Apart from the practical problems, this level of immigration is going to lead to SEVERE INDIGENOUS BACKLASH and civil disorder at some point. The Labour and leftard/luvvie stance on immigration is INSANE.

---

ACTUALLY, ALL THE ABOVE IS BS

There is ONLY one question to address,
and this is the one that SHOULD have
been on the referendum voting slip:

DO you want:

1) ... to REMAIN in the EU and thus abandon British sovereignty and be ruled from Brussels in a United States of Europe dominated by Germany and with French-style elitism and bureaucracy?

OR

2) ... to MAINTAIN British sovereignty and regain total control of fishing, the armed forces and all other economic, legal and financial matters in the hands of the British parliament?

Since NOT ONE SINGLE EUROPEAN CITIZEN (and certainly not British) has ever voted to abandon his or her country's sovereignty, the only honest vote was LEAVE. REMAIN votes were logically TREASONOUS in agreeing to abandon our sovereignty without a plebsicite.

And it IS the avowed and admitted aim of the EU to force Europe into a federal state. PLEASE NOTE that an attempt by a mostly unelected elite to force the citizens of a country to accept changes to its constitution through a plebiscite - or indeed other major policies - is a key feature of fascism.